Last Updated Projects in Property
|project id||project title||project type||project status||project scope||address||zipcode||city||county||state||country||description||desired outcome||published by||publishing date||forwarded by||forwarding date||creator||creating date||archived||featured||page id||page title||issue ids||agency ids||official ids||last modified||latitude||request||longitude||initiator cover photo||allow moderator photo upload||pinned solution id||sponsored||banner image||profile image||step ids||active step id||archetype||group id||person id|
|189149||One Broadway Plaza Project||Active||Santa Ana, CA, USA||Santa Ana||Orange County||CA||US||In 2004, the City of Santa Ana certified the EIR for One Broadway Plaza (State Clearinghouse No. 199101047). The Approved One Broadway Plaza Project does not allow for residential uses.
The project required a general plan amendment; amendment to the circulation element; amendment to the Midtown Specific Plan; adoption of the One Broadway Plaza Specific Development Zoning District; tentative map; vacation of Sycamore Street; encroachment permits/maintenance agreement; approval of inclusion of a portion of State-owned property; Historical Resource Commission review for demolition requests; and a State helipad permit.
Implementation of the Approved Project would impact two street segments: Main Street between 17th Street and 1st Street and Broadway between Santa Clara Avenue and 1st Street, and seven intersections (Main Street & 17th Street; Broadway Street & 17th; Main Street & Washington Avenue; Broadway Street & 4th Street; 1st Street & Flower Street; Santa Ana Boulevard & Flower Street; and Fairview & 1st Street).
|0000-00-00 00:00:00||0000-00-00 00:00:00||2020-06-13 06:03:25||0||321130||Proj:300659||67||17117||17726||2020-06-15 23:21:45||33.7454725||No||-117.867653||Yes||285470||no||Project banner 189149.jpg||0||124||9019491|
|640648||City threatens Seniors With Fines and Prison for Harmless Flowers||Active||St. Peters, MO, USA||St. Peters||St. Charles County||MO||US||Carl and Janice Duffner are senior citizens who, due to severe grass allergies, converted their entire yard into a beautiful, well-maintained, grass-free flower garden. All was well until one of their neighbors complained that the Duffners were not in compliance with a city ordinance that requires residential property owners to devote at least half of their yard to growing and maintaining “turf grass”, or face fines of up to $500 and 10 days in prison for each and every day they fail to comply. There is absolutely nothing unlawful or harmful about the Duffners’ flowers, yet St. Peters is threatening them with extraordinary fines and decades in prison simply because they choose to grow flowers instead of a plant that makes them sick.||0000-00-00 00:00:00||0000-00-00 00:00:00||mofreedom||2018-07-19 05:41:15||no||0||316256||Proj:403109||67||60043||51256||2018-07-27 03:31:17||38.7874699||No||-90.6298922||Yes||846561||no||Project banner 640648.jpg||0||0||0|
|417990||Open Martin's Beach||Active||State||Martin's Beach Road, Half Moon Bay, CA, USA||Half Moon Bay||San Mateo County||CA||US||Martin's Beach is a picturesque pocket beach just south of Half Moon Bay. It had long been visited by the public until soon after it was sold in 2008 to a then-anonymous owner for $32.5 million. Not long after the property changed hands, the billboard was painted over and a keycard gate was closed permanently to the public. The chances for future generations to make memories at Martin's Beach were brought to an abrupt halt when the locked gates and signs were erected at the entrance to the beach road. Surfrider Foundation cites the violations of the beach access protections of the California Coastal Act. Specifically, the property owner cannot add new development or change the intensity of use of coastal land without a Coastal Development Permit. The development here comes in the form of new gates, new signage and even the use of armed guards to deter public access. Surfrider Foundation cites the violations of the beach access protections of the California Coastal Act. Specifically, the property owner c||0000-00-00 00:00:00||0000-00-00 00:00:00||surfrider||2018-07-18 21:02:32||no||0||316237||Proj:185601||69||113,10488,47313,60049||131,10953,51263||2018-10-15 12:33:28||37.3755239||No||-122.4067911||Yes||2587913||yes||Project banner 417990.jpg||0||0||0|
|28368||Vision 20/20: A Proactive Evolution Plan for the Fort Worth Stockyards Historic District||Active||Local||Fort Worth, TX, USA||Fort Worth||Tarrant County||TX||US||The National Trust for Historic Preservation has put the Fort Worth Stockyards on its annual list of America's 11 most endangered historic places. As the last standing stockyards in the United States, dating back to 1887, It is one of the most significant sites in Texas, representing the cattle and livestock industry.
In 2014 the Fort Worth City Council approved a $175 million Stockyards Redevelopment - a development incentive from the city to bring more hotels, residences, offices and other venues to the Stockyards. However, the risk of insensitive development threatens this historically significant place.
|0000-00-00 00:00:00||0000-00-00 00:00:00||vision2020||2018-06-28 18:27:47||no||0||315781||Proj:437074||70||4924,16351,16392,16422,47364,46775||16939,51236,51237,16980,17010,51142||2019-05-10 08:46:26||32.7554883||No||-97.3307658||Yes||4630121||yes||Project banner 28368.jpg||0||0||0|
|293360||Constitutional Justice in Eminent Domain||Active||Federal||New London, CT, USA||New London||New London County||CT||US||As told in the magnificent Little Pink House, the city of New London and its New London Development Corporation (NLDC, now Renaissance City Dev. Corp.) planned to acquire and redevelop 90 acres on the Fort Trumbull peninsula. After the state invested $75 million in the plan, the NLDC used eminent domain to acquire lots owned by Susette Kelo, and her six neighbors. The NLDC argued the economic benefits of the proposed plan were a “public use” justifying the taking. Kelo sued, and the case reached the Supreme Court, which sided with the city. Thirteen years after the Kelo decision, after all the condemning and evicting and bulldozing, nothing has been built on the land that was taken. A hotel deal recently fell through, as did a plan for condominium units.||0000-00-00 00:00:00||0000-00-00 00:00:00||ij||2018-06-01 04:26:31||no||0||315202||Proj:1950||71||251,32974,47313,60021||283,33721,51186,51211||2018-06-04 08:16:57||41.3556539||No||-72.0995209||Yes||3962183||no||Project banner 293360.jpg||0||0||0|
|960212||Inter Miami MLS Soccer Project||Active||Global||Miami, FL, USA||Miami||Miami-Dade County||FL||US||David Beckham's MLS ownership group has taken so long to produce the plans for a Miami soccer stadium, according to the Miami Herald, that it now appears the measure couldn't be voted on before November. Neither the original proposed 9-acre property purchased in Overtown in 2016, nor current discussions to redevelop part of the Melreese golf course next to Miami International Airport, appear anywhere close to fruition.||0000-00-00 00:00:00||0000-00-00 00:00:00||Matt Harrison||2018-05-21 03:40:07||no||0||315058||Proj:152380||83,76,77,66,26,137||9839,16879||10273,17483||2018-07-25 12:42:30||25.7616798||No||-80.1917902||Yes||344925||no||Project banner 960212.jpg||0||0||0|
Top Agencies in Property
Top Officials in Property