Nevada's Banking Bill is Not a Viable Solution

Over the past few years, I’ve been an entrepreneur in the legal marijuana industry in Nevada and elsewhere. I can tell you firsthand how incredibly frustrating it can be to operate in an industry for which banking services are generally...Read more
Over the past few years, I’ve been an entrepreneur in the legal marijuana industry in Nevada and elsewhere. I can tell you firsthand how incredibly frustrating it can be to operate in an industry for which banking services are generally unavailable. Actions that most entrepreneurs take for granted, like making deposits, transferring payments, remitting employee payroll tax withholdings or sending earnings distributions to out-of-state investors, become incredibly difficult and dangerous when it all must be done by physically moving cash. Unfortunately, however, the proposal would mostly fail to solve the legitimate needs of the industry and would not improve the physical safety at marijuana dispensaries. The reasons for this are not shortcomings of the legislation itself, per se, but limitations inherent to a banking system that is predominantly regulated at the federal level. Understanding this history is important because any attempt at a marijuana bank in Nevada would likely run into similar complications. SB 437 essentially abandons hope of a marijuana bank receiving a Federal Reserve master account and only authorizes the bank to issue limited checks that would not go through the Fed clearinghouse. Those checks would only be payable to state and local governments for taxes and to certain in-state vendors who could only cash them at the marijuana bank. This means the marijuana bank would mostly be a glorified vault for marijuana businesses. This isn’t the type of fix that will improve the safety of marijuana businesses or their customers. The bill also requires the proposed bank or credit union to acquire deposit insurance. It’s unlikely that would happen unless the institution plans to serve a much broader population. Read less
Carson City, NV (State)
June 10, 2019
Submitted by: geofflawrence

Recent activity

Geoffrey Lawrence
edited the project details
3 months ago

Geoffrey Lawrence
suggested a solution
3 months ago
Geoffrey Lawrence
edited the project details
3 months ago
Geoffrey Lawrence
edited the project details
3 months ago
Geoffrey Lawrence
edited the project details
3 months ago
Geoffrey Lawrence
edited the project details
3 months ago
Geoffrey Lawrence
edited the project details
3 months ago
Geoffrey Lawrence
started a project
3 months ago

1 other solution

Geoffrey Lawrence

June 10, 2019

For now, the better way for a state like Nevada to facilitate banking of marijuana businesses is simply to provide data-sharing to existing banks regarding legitimate transactions by licensees. Short of federal action, such as passing the Safe and Fair Enforcement Banking Act, this would be the best thing states can do to facilitate marijuana banking.

No comments
Reply
Reply

 

Your solution

Supporting info

Senate Bill 437 (2019)

- Nevada Legislature

Nevada's Banking Bill is Not a Viable Solution for Businesses

2019/04/22 - Reason Foundation

Cannabis Banking Feasibility Report

2018/12/16 - California State Treasurer